
Sunday, 17th February 2008
On bright ideas and banana skins
The second week of the 2008 election campaign was characterized mainly by the Prime Minister’s last ditch and desperate attempt to salvage some political credibility for his party after it became clear that the PN could not shake off the scent and shadow of corruption which have clung to it like a leech for good reason.
Dr Gonzi has risked greatly and has used up practically all the political capital he has left on this issue. This is why he has finally announced a certain cabinet move when he is not certain to be the person forming the next cabinet. The grand announcement that, should the PN be re-elected, (that is a big if) Dr Gonzi would take over responsibility for MEPA and the environment is a clear and unmitigated admission not only of the failures of Environment Minister George Pullicino but also that the PN is not squeaky clean on this issue.
The way the Prime Minister has tried to sell this idea has, however, put him in a fix.
First of all, as Dr Alfred Sant retorted, this announcement does not exculpate Dr Gonzi from any political responsibility for the strange goings on within MEPA. As the saying goes, the buck stops with Dr Gonzi. Over and above this, as Dr Sant also said twice without the Prime Minister replying or denying it, there are people who have stated categorically that they informed Dr Gonzi about the not so very transparent way certain building development permits were issued. These same people said that despite this all they got from Dr Gonzi was a cup of coffee or, perhaps, two. There was no concrete action taken on their complaints.
Thus, Dr Gonzi’s grand announcement about taking over responsibility for MEPA and the environment after the March 8 election sounds very hollow indeed. Dr Gonzi has always told us to judge him on what he does and not on what he says. This is a case in point. People will judge him as not having done anything about reported corruption in relation to the issuing of building permits. For him to stake his shrinking political capital by trying to persuade us that he will do something about it after the election is not a bright idea but a desperate banana skin.
This banana skin was made more slippery by the Prime Minister’s contention that he would sort out MEPA just as he has sorted out public finances. As everybody knows the situation of the state’s finances is not as rosy as the Prime Minister wants us to believe. Indeed, over the last four years Dr Gonzi, as finance minister has presided over an annual increase in the tax burden of € 46.58 million (LM 20 million) for the last four years. Over and above this Dr Gonzi also raked in money from several and also from the EU. It is estimated that, all together, these three sources of revenue mean that Dr Gonzi had an extra € 500 million (LM 214.65 million) to spend.
Despite this, the overall national debt still spiraled to € 3.5 billion (LM 1.4 billion). In addition to this all the capital projects undertaken by the GonziPN government are either behind schedule or over-budget or both and this has cost us the taxpayers an additional € 445 million (LM 191 million)
These are hardly sound finances and even less of a record to boast about and cite as proof that one can deliver “MEPA fis-sod” and “Ambjent fis-sod!” as Dr Gonzi would have us believe.
So, objectively, what Dr Gonzi hoped would be a bright idea which would revive his and his party’s fortunes has ended up being as being a political banana skin of the first order.




RSS
Comments
An old neighbor used to tell me that MLP meant MALTA LABLAB PARTY , I think he was right.
By the way did you see the MLP Mass meeting on the granaries ,today? It was a BIG RED carpet of enthusiasm.
For the third time : "we are still half way to the finish line"
By the way, why are you reading The Times? According to John Schembri most MLP supporters do not even have a computer! Something is a bit contradictory here.
This also applies to the Times on line poll , the on line readership spectrum is a very narrow representation of the voting public. I am not saying that there isn't some truth in the poll , it can be interpreted that the TIMES PN voters have decided and the maybes are all MLP.
Still Mr Martinelli, the picture can be totally different , so I reaffirm what I said "DON'T COUNT YOUR CHICKENS BEFORE THEY HATCH , JOE "! IN MALTESE WE SAY "IT-TELLIEQA SAL BARKUN"
We are still half way . and already have what athletes call "The finish line syndrome!"
The Times poll shows us a win-win situation. Even on Maltatoday!! So are Labour afraid of Blueskies and other incentives by the present goverment to establish a link with us superhumans surfing high on the waves of smartisland? sorry I forgot that the sea is blue too! So heaven and sea are blue, I wonder where the red had been instilled? Mind you Alfred we see and hear other sites and views too.
How come nobody is noticing, or at least mentioning, The Times poll to your right?
A poll with almost 7300 participants is no small poll and it seems that if things continue to even hold on to the same pattern, then Dr. Sant is treading on one mighty big banana peel!
The common factor with these three socialist leaders being that they contributed negatively towards the environment; to mention a few: Ghar Lapsi dump site, Wied Fulija dump site, in Bubaqra Zurrieq , Maghtab dump site in the vicinity of Naxxar, Bugibba, Pembroke, Sliema, St Julians, Swieqi and St Andrew's, the inconvenience caused by the coal burning Power station to the people of Marsa, Paola, Fgura, Hamrun and the rest of the Harbour Area, the draining in the sea of raw sewage in Malta and Gozo.
Some examples of good New Labour town Planning can be seen in Marsascala and Bugibba , and what about the zigzagging bypass from Zabbar to Marsascala , that is real planning!
How can voters trust these people when, today Mr Grixti is telling us that "Dr Gonzi also raked in money from several and also from the EU"? Weren't we told that we will have only Lm1.5 million "Kontanti" from the EU. Was that a banana skin or should we leave this to the historians?
I tried to find some tangible proposals towards the Environment in "Pjan Ghal Bidu Gdid" the one which I found was not even there; the surcharge removal from our electricity bills on ALL households , incentivising more water and electricity waste.
Whom would the MLP be trusting as minister of the environment, Charles Buhagiar? Wouldn't there be a conflict of interest?
While wishing Alfred success as a candidate for the MLP (Montalto is not contesting), I beg him to write about fresh tangible MLP proposals (which haven't already been implemented). We readers already assume that Gonzi made mistakes, in his first four years as PM in the EU, after all the ones who don't make mistakes are the armchair critics. We want to hear about Labour's proposals (not pipe dream aims) on how to CONTINUE to better our lives (not a "new start") as a members in the EU.