• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Psychiatrist cleared of involuntary homicide

A psychiatrist who had prescribed pills to a Mount Carmel patient was this morning found not guilty of the woman’s involuntary homicide.

The woman who had been suffering from depression had overdosed on around 90 pills that psychiatrist Anthony Mangion had prescribed for her in 2001.

She had suffered a serious bout and was taken to the hospital on September 15, 2001. Two days later she was sent home after Dr Mangion, her psychiatrist for 15 years, had examined her and gave her a prescription for six pills a day for 15 days.

But on the day she was discharged, her son called his father and said that his mother had swallowed around 90 pills.

They took her to Mount Carmel on her insistence but, on their arrival, she lost consciousness and was rushed to St Luke’s Hospital. She died in the intensive care unit a day later.

During a magisterial enquiry, the woman’s husband testified that his wife had a history of overdoses, but the psychiatrist said he did not know this.

In his judgement this morning, Magistrate Antonio Mizzi that from the evidence produced, there was nothing to suggest that the accused had not acted according to practice and he had not been negligent.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

andreana attard (1 week, 6 days ago)
@Pamela Hansen
You're right. What is disturbing also is that no one has noticed this.
Edgar Azzopardi (1 week, 6 days ago)
@Joseph Schembri> How callous of you to put the blame on the magistrates. Do you know the reasons why this case took so long? If not, do not blame anyone, much less the judge.

A court case is made up of many players. Have you not heard of lawyers not turning up, or the defendents being unable to attend or postponements requested for soem reason or other?? The system itself is crazy especially where lawyers have to be in two courts at the same time. so to start blaming persons who are not to blame is very unfair
Imn 'Alla m'intix mhallef Sur Joseph Schembri !!!
Marcel Dingli (1 week, 6 days ago)
"there was nothing to sugest that " it has become a habit for the authorites to prosecute without one bit of proof. My suggestion : sue for damages Dr Mangion.
george farrugia (1 week, 6 days ago)
having sufferred many postponements in a court case myself and having to trudge to valletta and losing a half day's work in vain on each occasion I wish to suggest the implementation that lawyers wishing to postpone a case have to apply to the court at least 24 hours in advance. This gives the opportunity to the other party's lawyers to be aware of the postponement and therefore can advise his/her client that they need not show up. Alternatively, the chamber of advocates introduces a new code to their ethics obliging their lawyer members to communicate with each other ... something that is totally absent today. Less discomfort for the general public can only mean an increase in respect to the legal profession and the courts in particular.
Andrew Gatt (2 weeks ago)
Another perfect example of "justice delayed is justice denied". Too often we read about Court sentences finally delivered after years and years and years. In this case a professional has had a sword hanging over his reputation for 8 years. Finally he was aquitted. Now who will quantify the loss of reputation, the loss of business, the stress and the worry?

Years of legal expenses and time wasted, slogging into Valletta to give evidence or attend a hearing which is often cancelled with NO NOTICE (yes, in 2009, with all the gadgets and tools available to communicate and inform). Postponements, no-shows, delays, exaggerated deferrals, evidence lost, memories fading......what a disgraceful mess.

All the hype and promises about court reforms have not changed much, have they? To the ordinary citizen, our legal system is a maze of contradictions, disservice, expense and frustration. Efficiency, transparency, accountability, productivity and service standards are a distant dream. Ask anyone. "Il-Qorti taf meta tidhol biss!", jghidulek. And they're 100% right

Why is this unacceptable state of affairs allowed to persist?



Josepg Schembri (2 weeks ago)
What a sad state our justice (sic) system is in if a respected professional is put through hell for 8 years until his name is cleared!

Magistrates should be held accountable for this because they are king/queen in their courtrooms but at the end of the day they are there to serve society.
Pamela Hansen (2 weeks ago)
It is disturbing that a psychiatrist who had been "her psychiatrist for 15 years" did not know that the woman had a history of overdosing.
APace (2 weeks, 1 day ago)
It's really easy for people with depression who take medication to overdose, picking up stocks of medication from the pharmacy on presciption, and then these pills are there...at home so easy to reach. It's almost tempting when you're so depressed. Talking from experience, it really must start from family or friends to control these pills, hide and give them only when it's time. It's not easy, it's a responsability but it's a better option.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku