
Tuesday, 3rd November 2009 - 13:45CET
Man accused of stealing Melita TV service
Ebrahim el Asrag, 55, an Egyptian resident in Birzebbugia, this morning pleaded not guilty to stealing Melita Cable television services.
The prosecution is alleging that he used a splitter to distribute the Melita TV service to eight rooms in an old people's home which he runs in Fgura.







RSS
Comments
The saying "People in glass houses ..... comes to mind.
Snap, Crackle and Pop should be left best for Rice Crispies. At the price we pay I expect that we get great service. Not good, or decent...but great. Sky Italia at 20Euro per month including HD decoder and installation...not bad eh?
Watching the Juve match on Tuesday, the picture was extremely bad. EXTREMELY bad. The resolution was incredibly bad and the refresh rate? Dear me...I assume you do know what I am talking about? Fairly bog-standard talk these days.
I totally agree with you regarding Melita HD transmissions mate. Nobody can give an answer to that. Typical Malta. Typical Malta.
As for Mr.Asrag's case...somebody must have snitched on him....Technically I think the laws must be made clear on this...too much of a grey area...
Is it illegal to cut off a FREE TO AIR TV in order to buy your service????
Are you sure the problem is not with your installation and/or tv? Personally i never experienced any of your allegations.. on the contrary sometimes Go transmission is even better than certain Free to Air satellite tv stations.
and btw: sarcasm did not give any weight to your argument. Enjoy the now-almost-absolete analague free tv..
u find heaps of good channels- dont need to pay
http://freetubetv.net/
enjoy
I suppose that you are also happy with the public transport and roads in Malta because you can still get from A to B. You were also happy with Deserta chocolate because it tasted and looked somewhat like chocolate as well.
You are happy because Go's picture does not crackle or distort. We can put up with muffled sound, dull and grainy picture. Thank god for little mercies.
Mediocrity reigns supreme.
I am neither a shareholder not an employee of Go. However i AM a subscriber. I cannot digest the comments regarding the alleged low resolution especially on HD TV's. I'm not saying they transmit at 720 or 1080P, however the picture IS very decent and does NOT crackle or get distorted.
Thing is last time I talked to a Melita employee at a managerial level, he claimed Melita was negotiating for HD transmissions. This was 2 summers ago.
Go employees at least had the decency to admit they knew nothing.
Now, regarding the splitting case maybe Asrag was giving the service at a price?
Such waste products should be recycled or disposed of properly. Melita technicians are setting a bad example in an eco-conscious age. One must remember that littering is illegal and punishable by law.
And even the quality is not one of an EU country in 2010, standard although the prices are.
In Italy for example Sky Italia, the last package launched by this company last month was : A contract for 36 months & you'll get a 32" TV HD FREE, a decoder HD FREE too & more than 100 channels (True channels like various Movie ones dated 2008/2009, Sports, National Geographic, Nickelodeon ect.. not like the ones offered by Melita in their Reception package) for the price of € 19.99 monthly. Not to mention that they didn't know what even means the INSTALLATION FEE !!
Melita is lucky enough that sky haven't opened a subscribtion centre here in Malta cause I bet that all actual Melita subscribers will switch immediately.
CAN SOMEONE STOP THEM !
Their accusations, at least in my eyes, appear to compare to the times when owning a cordless telephone or more recently when utilising IP telephony was considered illegal.
All the benefits of these technologies should be embrassed.
Now, I have one decoder with one TV. But if I needed another outlet in another room, you mean I would not be allowed to do it??. I can't watch both TVs at once can I ?
So in fact there would only be one transmission being used. No amount of insane reasoning can get me through that.... Internet service is allowed splitting, why not TV?
And let's be honest. The prices are ridiculously high. Watching Italia1 advertise their Hi-Def offering at low prices make me sick...and this in a country where wages are higher.
Although I agree I am not being forced to use Melita, this is nothing but legal bullying. What else can we football fans do except bow our heads and accept the inevitable prices?
grillomalta@gmail.com , in case Melita feels somebody with a modicum of IT knowledge send me mail.
Legally he can split to million rooms on the licence address.
BUT HE CANNOT CHARGE ANYONE IN THAT HOME.
ANY PROSECUTOR WHO BROUGHT HIM TO COURT ON BEHALF OF MELITA IS NAIVE.
SHOULD BEEN PROSECUTED FOR CHARGING THE INMATES.
The problem is that Melita enforces terms and conditions that are abusive and in certain cases illegal. They are lucky that the competition authority in Malta is hopeless, otherwise they would not be able to use abusive terms and conditions to operate in the market. Consumer rights are over terms and conditions
Exactly!! You got the point. Disconnecting from Melita is a real, real challenge...and a expensive one too. Melita grabs you by the ....
See Go's special offers and you will reliase that you will save and all this is promoted and not classified as illegal.
Re illegality : there is also a term called legalised crime.
Not all legislation is written with honest intent.
I changed to another provider this afternoon, after hearing about this.
@ Evelyn Cini
Publish the Melita Cable removal notice when you quit as Melita Cable customer!
Take the challenge both of you!
I'm not a Melita customer, neither. I'm subscribed with Go. At home, I have three TV sets, and pay for three Go decoders. If somebody's suggesting that I have every right to have only one decoder for three TV sets, then it's either I'm naive, or else you're suggesting an illegality.
Allahares kont magistrat, sur J.Borg!
At present I do not use any of Melita Cable's services.
Kindly advise as to what mistaken ideas you claim that I may be installing in peoples' minds.
On the other hand, Melita has been charging for free-to-air channels, already paid for by foreign tax payers or advertisers. So does that mean that Melita will be paying back its customers?
at least this act was for a good cause......if only Melita can say so as well!
Roll out the flashy advertising.....
Does your comment subtly imply that you're stealing from Melita too? I'm not saying you are, but sometimes, some comments are better left unsaid. They might help to conjure mistaken ideas in some people's minds.
Presuming that he was paying for the service to the home and therefore had one decoding box. Splitting the outgoing signal from the decoding box would mean that every connected TV would have to be watching the same transmission.
In this case all it does is to help the old people living in the home to be able to see the programme without all having to crowd into one room where perhaps the sound would be too loud for some and not loud enough for others.
By my own reasoning, as long as there is no fiddling around with the decoding box, this is not stealing but common sense; you pay for the level of transmission which you then surely have a right to watch. I would not be surprised if many cable users as well as terrestrial signal users etc do exactly the same thing - say one TV in the front room, another in the kitchen, another in one or more bedrooms.
Melita Cable use my front garden and the facade of my house without even giving me a cent in compensation.
I am even faced with numerous problems relating to rising damp.
Does Melita Cable have the guts to claim that someone is stealing?
The accused should have every right to use a splitter provided that the service is within the same building.
The most Melita Cable should do is stop providing the service.