
Monday, 2nd November 2009
If offshore wind farm fails, we are stuck - Pullicino
The wind monitoring mast being installed in Mellieħa. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
If the offshore reef off Mellieħa is not adequate for a wind farm, Malta will be "stuck" and will probably have to ask the EU to reconsider its expectations, according to Resources Minister George Pullicino.
Speaking at the launch of an 80-metre-high wind monitoring mast, Mr Pullicino yesterday said the planned 18-20 turbines at Sikka l-Bajda (together with the smaller farms in Baħrija and Ħal Far) would generate almost 40 per cent of the clean energy Malta needed to reach the 2020 EU-imposed targets.
The EU stipulates that, by that deadline, 20 per cent of the energy Malta generates must come from clean renewable sources.
The monitoring mast set up this week at L-Aħrax will develop a wind profile of the area by measuring wind speed and direction in order to see whether the planned offshore wind farm is feasible. But if it is not, there is no immediate Plan B.
"We would have done all we could within our limitations but if this does not work out we will have to wait for better technology for deep offshore wind farms so that we can start to exploit it," Mr Pullicino said.
He pointed out that Sikka l-Bajda was Malta's only shallow reef, big enough for an offshore wind farm.
Malta is surrounded by deep sea, so once the technology improves we would have no problems to set up offshore wind farms, including floating ones, according to Mr Pullicino.
"The problem at the moment is that the technology for deep sea wind farms is still very expensive and it is not proven. We cannot be guinea pigs. The kind of wind farms we are looking at are off the shelf," he said.
In 2006, the government had said it wanted to pursue a deep water offshore wind farm after Sikka l-Bajda was discarded because of "enormous visual and other impacts". Eventually, however, the deep water project was ditched because the technology was not advanced enough.
Mr Pullicino pointed out that wind monitoring would also take place in the other two smaller proposed sites for onshore farms, that is, Baħrija and Ħal Far.
In Ħal Far, a mast will be installed similar to the one in Mellieħa, whereas in Baħrija, the government will make use of the telecommunication poles already there.
The government is also working on a number of other renewable energy projects including solar panelling on public buildings, domestic and industrial schemes to incentivise wind and solar energy as well as energy from waste. If all the projects go through as planned, Malta would "just about" manage to reach its targets, so if the major one at Sikka l-Bajda falls through things will look even worse.
He said Malta was limited for space partly because of the high population density but also because the land that was available was generally of environmental or historic importance and, therefore, could not be touched.
Mr Pullicino added that, together with the two-year wind monitoring campaign, the ministry also had to study the reef itself to ensure that the ecosystem was not too sensitive for the development. The monitoring mast, which received the planning authority's seal of approval last week, stands on its own weight and did not require any drilling for it to be installed.
It is supported by strong ropes decorated with red markers to reduce bird collisions, following Birdlife Malta's warning that the area is populated by Shearwaters.
The €150,000 mast is equipped with some 17 small wind vanes that will record the wind's power and velocity from different directions and at different altitudes.







RSS
Comments
I am quoting science and the most renowned climatologist of the whole planet. He is not living a fairy tale, he is not a denier, he is not in the oilmen's paypacket, the truth is that he is saying what science is telling him.
Should we then play it safe like Blaise Pascal and spend 80 trillion dollars to fight a Quixotic battle against an inexistent enemy and reduce the global temperature by 0.0C?
Why don't other countries build large solar powerstations, they don't have financial and space problems and we could buy energy from them!
"JUST STAND THERE---DON'T DO SOMETHING!!!"
and the worst thing we can do is is precisely that - DO NOTHING through paying attention to all the Ludditesout there who are afraid of change -and simply continue tio hesitate and end up doing exactly nothing,
let's get on with it ! . We already missed a golden opportunity in 2004 at Marfa Ridge.
To those saying "We don't have enough land space to energise the nation" "we cannot meet all Malta's needs with RE" and so on------------- this is not the point! The expression goes "Slowly, slowly catchy monkey" -(1) we must start and gradually build up from 5% to 10% and so on. (2)the secret lies in DIVERSITY - at present we are much limited to Solar and Wind (plus a cable connection to the EU Grid) which we should exploit as far as possible. With time other possibilities will present themselves (and this blog has yielded many excellent positive suggestions) we will (hopefully) take them up. Gradually we will depend less on fossil fuels and produce more and more clean energy…..
continues----------
Sorry to let you down but in Malta the tide is minimal and cannot be exploited for the generation of electricity. The maximum change in sea level is around 0.4 metres at spring tide and this is not enough to have high velocity currents.
Locations were tidal devices could be/are installed undergo a sea level change of more than 4 metres (even up to 8m) - for example the Mull of Galloway(Scotland) and Solway Firth (N. Ireland) and ideally have spring tide currents that exceed 2 metres/second. Unfortunately Malta cannot adopt this technology.
Mater Dei has taken about 17 years to be finished..
During these 17 years.. how come no one ever thought of installing solar panels on the roofs?? That would have been a clear example that the government has the environment really at heart..
As usual.. is there anyone responsible for such bad planning??
I am sure that with the costs allocated towards wind farms a longer term plan like that above will not only help replace our supply to a 100% clean system but will also change the strategy Enemalta uses and generate more employment and a supply of natural resources (solar).
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/co2_report_july_09.pdf
and so say many other scientists: Piers Corbyn, the British astrophysicist and the most successful weatherman on the planet calls AGW theory 'FRAUD WITH LIPSTICK'. OPEN YOUR EYES.
http://www.tidalenergyltd.com/
Engineers find solutions no matter what, they are very well trained to do so. Everything is possible when the political will is there and available. There are infinite permutations to what can be done with photovoltaic cells, the panels can be made to move along the suns path during the day, for example. It all needs one to think and make the best of what is available. The mast here will provide valuble statistical data. This data can then be analysed and made best use of but to start arguing about where how what !!! I find this totally ridiculous. ( this very last sentence is not directed to you).
Finally, The laws of Energy Conservation tell us that Energy cannot be Created nor destroyed. Perpetual motion is only possible on paper, nowhere else in the universe !!!
And do you want us to beleive you that you care one IOTA? Hallina Sur u toghoqodux tiftahru meta taghamlu u kif jghid il MALTI jekk taghamlu dak xogholkhom fuq kollox u jekk joghogobkhom tinsewhx dan id dritt lejn Malta ! grazzi
@ Stephen Vassallo - SDolar energy is not free, clean maybe, but nor free. It costs around 27 Euro cents per Unit - around 45% higher then what you pay for electricity today!#
I can imagine how many of you would happily pay more for each unit used just so that we can priduce less carbon dioxid
I would like to ask, since I am no expert, if it is possible to mount photovoltaic panels along a house facade incorporating it the design so as not to have these things on roofs. Obviously we have to built facades facing the right direction to catch the sun. Would enough energy be produced to make each household self sufficient? Would the expense incurred be viable in the long run?
Take a part of your power station output- plus a bit of solar power, to de-compose water. Now take the resulting gases to run the engines that turn the generators.
Carbon emissions- zero
Cost of water-zero
Dependency on oil-zero
Or is that too difficult?
Saying all this, why don't we have a system like other EUROPEAN countries, ie Germany, where people use solar panels on their houses and sell the electricity they generate to the grid for 1.8 times the tariff! NOW THIS IS A REAL INCENTIVE TO GENERATE CLEAN ENERGY. Even if we were to be paid like for like (as the system is here now), i'm sure that if the government subsidized half the cost for solar panels, a lot of people would install them. This way a lot of area could be used to generate electricity (how many people really use their roofs?) Why don't the government speak to a manufacturer about supplying Malta in bulk ? This way they would give us a real deal !
Consider simple energy balance. I explain, take for example steel, how is it produced ? Iron Ore is melted, meaning one energy input simply to produce the raw material. Then come the shaping processes, more energy inputs and so on until we have at the end of all this say, a nice CAR !!! What happens to cars with age, they start rusting, no, why ? Because matter as presented in nature allways seeks to go back to a lower state of energy : Meaning the oxide of iron as it once was before getting into the production chain of the CAR we humbly drive on our sunday drives !!!!
If some of these complainers about wind, solar energy and so on know how much energy is simply lost during our daily lives....................People would simply shut up for good !!!
Furthermore, do you know Maltese complainers about wind energy and all, how expensive the production of the simple DRINKING WATER in Malta is...................????
See for yourselves, check out how Reverse Osmosis works, and ask does Malta have mountains, lakes, large land mass where ALL the rainwater can be collected ???????
. As I already have said that the costs of energy in Malta is not of price but of distribution. Presently the Government buys this energy at a fixed price while it sells to the consumer at any set price, to sustain a bankrupt, mismanaged and debt ridden EneMalta!
If Malta hooks to the Euro grid there will be no other options for the Malta Government to pay its given price and taxes on utility bills! Watch out soon you will have to pay VAT on your Water and Electricity bill!
Bottom line is, the world is now on it's Oil, Gas and coal decent and uranium peaked in 1981.
The less virgin resources the more energy required to obtain them. If the whole world went Nuclear we would be out of Uranium and other fissile material within a decade. If we all turned to coal to power everything and even our electric cars we would be out of cheap abundant coal within a few decades and by the middle of the century earth would almost be inhabitable for humans. Alex, Just look at UK north sea if you want to see Peak oil in action and then take a glance at Mexican oil production - mexico will soon be a net oil importer, what will USA do then for the 2 million barrels a day it gets from them? Now we get an idea what Iraq was all about.
The coming conference is not just a GW conf - but about powering the future. Man has always gone to war over energy and water.
I wouldn't bet on that - not with huge emerging economies all competing for oil - which is a finite resource. The price could rise astronomically as it starts to get scarce…
@John Cauchi - SPOT ON !!!!
e camilleri is right in saying that simply employing people to produce cheap solar heaters and sell them cheaply - this is very sound because the energy saved in heating water is far and away the most efficient efficient way to conserve energy. And this brings up what nobody thinks about ! CONSERVATION !!! For instance, if AC's were to be banned (I can hear people SCREAMING and PROTESTING!!!) we would probably cut down energy requirement by 25% - If we made our houses energy efficient we could save another 20% (some put it as high as 40%) &c &c
We are not even scratching the surface of our energy problem until we do something about energy saving. But then I'm the 73 year old guy who still uses a bike instead of a car (just back from Valletta by bike and so I didn't add a milligram of pollution to our air to get there AND I enjoyed the ride - gives you that apres-ski feeling)
I AGREE with Charles Downing(Malta should be making much more of solar power), C Bonello(Solar power is without limits) and my colleague Stephen Vassallo(if wind farms fail the sun will not)--------------------------we have a great potential for Solar Power and this surely must be part of our energy mix. The only snag is that you only get power in daytime…that's why we need variety in RE so as to make up for intermittency.
@Martin Spiteri--solar panels on private houses and blocks of flats roofs?----------------yes, yes, yes - we have (or maybe one should say "had" because we now only build apartment blocks!) a lot of potential there - not to mention roofs of Govt buildings, hospitals, schools……….
Paul Caruana(what about a solar thermal power plant located on barren comino?)-------wonderful idea but i expect that comino is probably a Sacred Cow (tourism!) There are other sites I suppose ....
@james whelan @ wind generally fails at times of peak requirements-----------------eh? WHEN is peak requirement? That the wind is random is a problem - one usually calculates on getting energy 25% of the time and not constantly. Solar power is also intermittent (no power at night and on cloudy days….) the secret is DIVERSITY - a combination of wind/Solar/EU grid connection and other possible future RE technology. Therefore what Paul Barrett said "we need to make our own power by a variety of methods" is spot on.
@edward bartolo@territory is limited and our resources are even more limited-------------------------No, we have extensive relatively uninhabited areas where we could fit land based wind farms and remember when better technology (eg less expensive offshore) becomes available the turbines are simply removed!
What we have to take into account is 1) we already have intolerable pollution, 2) Oil will sooner or later become so expensive (with South America, China and India competing for it) that wind energy will be a doddle financially. And 3) Oil will soon run out sooner or later so we'd better start now making our position more secure by going for EVERY Renewable modality and no remining 100% oil-dependent. .
@Alex Ellul @ we (do not) have the necessary land for megawatt wind turbines and neither do we have the right winds ----------------------------------------Sorry Al, we do - Most of Malta lives on only about 30% of our surface and there are quite extensive relatively uninhabited areas where we could fit land based wind farms. Eg Marfa Ridge where the originally proposed Wind Farm was to be sited (extrapolated wind speed estimate was about 7.2 M/S which is OK)
@edward bartolo@Wind is extremely unreliable, -not a single watt of power------------------I know the Med is not the north sea (or windy Denmark) but if our wind testing shows a mean annual wind speed greater than 7metres/second then we are in business.
@GodwinYoung@possible effects of wind turbines a few miles away from Malta's only airport?-------------------- This has been checked - no prob.
Continues
Some mention PVCs as the ideal means of converting sunlight into energy. What they fail to calculate is: the cost: the area required to provide sufficient energy for the household: the number of multifamily apartments with one small single roof: the ability to expose the PVCs to sunlight: the fact that charging can only be done during the day: the high cost of the storing devices from which energy is extracted during the night: the total daily consumption in wattage required to run heavy appliances (washing machines, dryers, refrigerator) plus lighting: the down time for equipment failure: the time and expense involved for repairs and the inconvenience during downtime, etc.
The problems are real, solutions are hard to get.
@Marco Cremona@It is possible for Malta to invest in a wind farm in Scotland - Marco! Sorry, I disagree - Malta MUST get out of its 100% dependency on oil. It is absurd to continue polluting our country to save money while Scotland benefits by producing clean energy and aids local employment just to save us carbon tariffs. We must embark on RE asap. This will also provide local employment and we could also go commercial by eventually servicicng the Med area for RE applications &c &c We cammit remain stuck in the middle ages. .
Continues
Mr Ellul, you clearly choose to live in an unreal world where climate change is not anthropogenic, and where oil is the best thing that ever happened to humanity.
Maybe when Msida is an underwater relic, you will come to your senses... oh, I forgot! You probably are old enough to miss that time when (I hope not) it will come! Well, I will be here still, unless some tragedy comes my way.
Watch the film "Age of Stupid" - the science in it is not fancy, contrary to what you will undoubtedly say in reply. Global Warming is a fact, and we should all play our part. If we need to suffer economically, then so be it.
These wind farms are the best thing the Maltese government will do in a LONG time. And to those who complain about the visual impact- they are far more beautiful and graceful than any polluting chimney visible from half of Malta! That's for sure! Pollution-free too!
We chose to join the EU, we must play by the rules.
1. Malta is part of a bigger community: The European community. We have the ability to buy clean nuclear power from our neighbours.
2. Buying power from our neighbours would provide us with lower and more stable prices.
3. Carbon based power generation *does* contribute to global warming.
4. Considering the EU will pick up the majority cost of our getting connected to the European grid, why do we not take all our power requirements from there?
The simple fact is that the Nationlist government does not want to do anything about the problem because (select any from the below):
a. There's less money to be made when buying from abroad (bribes).
b. They don't know and don't want to know (ignorance).
c. They're scared of the votes they might lose (denial).
d. They couldn't care less. (I'm all right, Jack).
What ever the reasons are, you can be certain you'll get neither a straight or honest answer from this lot.
But the main reason why we should not invest in these expensive politicians' toys is that climate change is only natural. There is no man made global warming. The only problem we have is the cost of electricity which we have to generate in a very inefficient way, paying TRIPLE what the USA-consumer pays. The only way we have to go is to get the most economical way to energise this island, the rest follows, be it solar, safe nuclear, clean carbon etc. Economics is the name of the game, not toying around with expensive ideas that will cost the western world an estimated $80 trillion
It is no longer wind farms that are being experienced they passed their time. Mr Pullicino or rather his advisers must look into Google and search for wind energy high up in the sky, and they will be aware of new technologies that will not spoil the view. High up in the sky there is no danger of lack of wind.
There exists also such things as sea waves energy.
The Maltese Government should invest in local inventiveness. For example, this year Scotland started a competition which involves local companies in trying to come up, and implement the best energy producing solution. The price is a hefty 20 million pounds sterling, which is quite a lot but the investment from the companies is going to be much more than this, when one considers what teh companies will spend on research. Why does not the Maltese governement do the same? It would encourage local companies to invest in research and new technology and at the same time it would increase Malta's clean energy output. The way forward is through new technology and innovation. Malta should come up with a solution tailor made for itself and not try to do what other countries are doing.
but wind farms are 'sexy' you see, they are the ultimate phallic totem to the green religion. costs and common sense do not factor in the equation.
Pullicino does not need a wind mast - he only needs to look at the experience of other countries which incidentally have more favourable wind patterns and still proved to be an expensive failure requiring investments in 'hot standby' conventional generation.
Most people simply do not comprehend the requirement of frequency synchronization for a grid to function or for the matter issues such as energy storage etc. The whole debate has become a belief system and nothing more.
Malta needs a couple of the Russian-built nuclear reactor-wagons -- maximum efficiency, cheap maintenance costs (18-month refueling cycle; ~Eur 8 million) and 100% clean air (save for the 300K vehicles around and 60-odd butts in the parliament)..
At least we would be using space of already built up areas and not continuing eating from the little natural spaces we have left.